types of law造句
例句與造句
- Issue17 : there are two types of laws : just and unjust
有兩種法律：公平的和不公平的。 - Types of law
法的類型 - One type of law that requires civil disobedience is any law that breaks our basic moral code
一類需要文明違反的法律是那些違反了基本道德準則的法律。 - From the standpoint of theory , market behavior is tied to a mathematical law , but it is just not the same type of law found in the physical sciences
從理論的角度講，市場行為遵循一個數(shù)學定律，但這與自然科學中發(fā)現(xiàn)的定律又不一樣。 - The argumentative approach to the subject is based on the theory of ideal types of law conceived by max weber p ? nonet and p ? selznick . the thread of the dissertation is the tendency of anti - formalism in modern law
以現(xiàn)代法律發(fā)展的反形式主義趨勢為主線，在反思民法、行政法等傳統(tǒng)法律模式的基礎上，從法律內(nèi)容、法律推理、法律職業(yè)、法律機構(gòu)幾方面展現(xiàn)了經(jīng)濟法不同于傳統(tǒng)法律模式的新的法律特質(zhì)。 - It's difficult to find types of law in a sentence. 用types of law造句挺難的
- In this sense , economic law is a new type of law and represents a newfashioned legal mode , which development has impacted and influenced largely our traditional legal notion legal technology and legal knowledge
從這個角度來看，經(jīng)濟法是現(xiàn)代社會中涌現(xiàn)出來的一種新的法律類型或法律形態(tài)，代表了一種新型的法律模式，其產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展對我們既有的法律觀念、法律技術(shù)和法律知識等都產(chǎn)生了巨大的沖擊和影響。 - Part iii in this part , the author summarizes foreign scholar ' s theory of ideal types of law , such as r ? m ? unger gunther teuber jurgen habermas p ? nonet and p ? selznick . in ideal types sense , the author argues that economic law is substantive rational law but not formal rational law
漸次概述并比較了韋伯之后國外學者如昂格爾、田中成明、諾內(nèi)特和塞爾茲尼克、圖依布納、哈貝馬斯等人提出的各種法律類型理論，認為在理想類型的意義上，可以把經(jīng)濟法定位成一種實質(zhì)理性法而非形式理性法。 - The dissertation contains five parts : part i according to max weber ' s theory of ideal types of law , the author summarizes formalistic development of law and analyzes relative problems , such as the definition of legal formalization law how and why to be formalized modern law why to be anti - formalism conflict and harmony between formal rationality and substantive rationality of law . this is prepared for the next argument
具體包括以下五部分內(nèi)容：第一部分主要是通過梳理韋伯的法律類型學理論，概述法律的形式化發(fā)展，分析了什么是法律形式化、法律如何形式化、法律為什么要形式化、現(xiàn)代法何以反形式化、法的形式理性和實質(zhì)理性的沖突與調(diào)和等相關(guān)問題，為后面的論證奠定理論基礎。 - Based on the argument , the author analyzes the independence of economic law and the relation among economic law public law and private law . in the author ' s opinion , economic law is independent of legal mode or types of law but not independent of legal department . the author is of opinion that independence of economic law is unrelated to the partition between public law and private law
并從這一觀點出發(fā)，對經(jīng)濟法的獨立性、經(jīng)濟法與公法、私法的劃分問題提出了不同看法，認為經(jīng)濟法并非在部門法意義上獨立，而是獨立于法律類型或法律模式，并且這種獨立性也與公法、私法的劃分問題沒有直接聯(lián)系。